On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 4:37 PM Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 11/28/22 12:41, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document:draft-moskowitz-ipsecme-ipseckey-eddsa-06 > Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya > Review Date: 2022-11-28 > IETF LC End Date:2022-12-12 > IESG Telechat date: (if known) > > Summary: Ready with nits. It will be nice to explain why these IANA > Registry additions for EdDSA Public Keys to the IPSECKEY not done with > RFC 8080 which defined it in Feb. 2017. > > > 8080 is for DNSSEC. OK. But this is for other uses. Now those that use > the IPSECKEY RR are ready to use EdDSA, so could of, would of, should of. > It was not done, now it is. RFC numbers are relatively cheap. Explain > what? That 8080 was only for DNSSEC RR and this is for IPSECKEY RR? Why? > Leave it alone. > I think this should be explained explicitly in the draft. > > > > Major issues: > None > > Minor issues: > None > > Nits/editorial comments: > Appendix A > please add an IPv6 example. RFC 4025 does have some. > > > Yes, 4025 defines all the gateway use cases, so has gateway RR examples > with only ONE public key format. > > This draft is to add EdDSA as a public key format and gives the example of > what that key looks like in the IPSECKEY RR. Any reader that wants the > gateway use case will use 4025 for those examples. I do not see where > cluttering up this document with use cases already covered in 4025 adds > value/clarity. > > I thought the example is for IPv4, so I asked to make it IPv6. The issue is not "cluttering up the document". Please reply to this Bob. Behcet > So I respectfully state that I prefer to leave all the gateway examples > out of this document. > > Bob > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
