Hi Owen,
Thanks for committing the fixes.
To the one inline comment:
On 11/25/22 10:39, Owen Friel (ofriel) wrote:
Section 2:
" Fully-Qualified Domain Name (FQDN): This is often just a clear way
of saying the same thing as "domain name of a node", as outlined
above. However, the term is ambiguous."
These two sentences appear to contradict each other - Is the term clear or ambiguous? I
suggest removing the word "clear" to simply state how the term is commonly
used, and then point out the ambiguity.
[ofriel] The section starts with stating:
" The following terms are defined in DNS Terminology [RFC8499] and are
reproduced here"
The definition is an exact quote from RFC8499. Do we need to get the definition
in RFC8499 updated? I am unsure if I should change the definition of FQDN in
this ACME document and would prefer to change the definition in the common
source of these DNS terms. What does IESG recommend?
Oh, I see. Agreed, there's no need to change the definition of FQDN in
this document.
I find it strange phrasing, but it's still clear enough, and I'll defer
to the DNS folks on whether anything needs to be updated here.
Best,
Reese
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
