Paul, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this 
document.

Lars


> On Oct 25, 2022, at 17:54, Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-06
> Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
> Review Date: 2022-10-25
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-28
> IESG Telechat date: ?
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review.
> 
> Issues:
> 
> Major: 0
> Minor: 1
> Nits:  2
> 
> 1) MINOR: In Section 4.1 (Extension Format):
> 
> The following:
> 
> "CAs SHOULD use the one-way hash function that is associated with the 
> certificate signature to compute the hash value, and CAs MAY include other 
> hash values."
> 
> introduces the possibility that a client might not support *any* of the 
> provided hash algorithms. This seems bad.
> 
> RFC3709 didn't have this problem because it required that an SHA-1 hash be 
> included and supported.
> 
> This can be fixed by changing "CAs SHOULD" to "CAs MUST".
> 
> 2) NIT: From IdNits:
> 
> ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 1952
> 
> I think it would be ok to change the reference to Informative.
> 
> 3) NIT: Typos
> 
> In Section 3 (Logotype Data):
> 
> s/then each image objects/then each image object/
> 
> In Section 7 (Image Formats):
> 
> s/The following table lists many commons/The following table lists many 
> common/
> 
> s/requirements these image formats/requirements for these image formats/
> 
> s/the client will receive response/the client will receive a response/
> 
> (The last one above appears twice.)
> 
> In Section 10 (Privacy Considerations):
> 
> s/cache logotype data is cached/cache logotype data/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to