On February 17, 2023 at 11:17:10 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Behcet: Hi! Thanks for your review! ... > Flag Bit 7 in PIM common header is defined as Capability bit but in Figure 1 > and throughout the draft it is marked as P bit not as C bit That is meant to be the Packed Capability, hence "P". But you bring up a good point in that the terminology is not consistent. The text should be consistent in using "packet capability" (vs just "capability"). > However, RFC 8736 seems to indicate that Flag Bit 7 is already reserved as > No-Forward bit in RFC 5059 So maybe another Flag bit needs to be used. Each PIM message has a separate field of flag bits. rfc5059 uses bit 7 in the Bootstrap message (only). Bit 7 in the Register-Stop message is not used. Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
