On Wed, Jul 12, 2023, at 03:34, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>> Please consider redrawing the figures using SVG instead of ASCII.
>> Especially Figure 4 would greatly benefit from this enhancement.
>
> I think Figure is about as complex as they get, and it doesn't delight me.
> But using SVG is a step too far for me.
aasvg almost turns Figure 4 into something comprehensible, but I think that the
problem is that it is just too busy. The content of those clouds, especially
the bottom two, is just incomprehensible. I think that you might be better
served by trying to do less with the figure.
The top, with some tweaks, looks pretty good with aasvg. It's quite a bit
clearer than the text version, despite this not really degrading the text
version much, if at all. I couldn't say the same for the bottom half:
.--. .--. .--.
|CE| |CE| |CE|
'--' '--' '--'
AC : AC : AC :
-+--+----+--+----+--+- -------
( |PE|....|PE|....|PE| ) ( IETF )
IETF Network ( '--' '--' '--' ) ( Network )
Slice Service ( :..............: ) ( Slice )
Request ( IETF Network Slice ) ( ) Customer
v ---------------------- ------- View
v ............................\........./...............
v \ / Provider
v >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grouping/Mapping v v View
v ^ -+--+-------+--+--------+--+-------+--+--
v ^ ( |PE|.......|PE|........|PE|.......|PE| )
.---------. ( '--' '--' '--' '--' )
| | ( :.....................: )
| NSC | ( Network Resource Partition )
| | -----------------------------------------
| | ^
| |>>>>> Resource Partitioning |
'---------' of Filtered Topology |
v v |
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
