Ines, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.
Lars > On May 26, 2023, at 23:15, Ines Robles via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > Document: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-12 > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review Date: 2023-05-26 > IETF LC End Date: 2023-05-26 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > This document specifies procedures for representing and verifying the identity > of application services in TLS. It obsoletes RFC6125. The document is clear. I > just have minor nits-related-questions. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > *Section 6.1: "...a list of acceptable reference identifiers...": acceptable > according to whom? Maybe acceptable can be replaced by something like > valid/authorized/approved?, e.g. "...a list of valid reference > identifiers..."? > What do you think? > > * Section 7.5: "... limiting the number of names that any server can speak > for..." Maybe: "..."Limiting the number of names that any server can > represent..."? What do you think? > > * Appendix A: What about to add a sentence such as: ...the title of this > document is different from the title of RFC6125 because...? > > Thanks for this document, > > Ines. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
