Russ, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this 
document.

Lars


> On Jun 30, 2023, at 18:33, Russ Housley via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-10
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2023-06-30
> IETF LC End Date: 2023-07-12
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> 
> Summary: Almost Ready
> 
> 
> Major Concerns: None.
> 
> 
> Minor Concerns:
> 
> Section 2.2: Please provide more discussion of "central authority".  I
> do not think that a Internet-wide authority is required to meet this
> requirement.  I think that the authority needs to be recognized
> throughout a provider network.
> 
> 
> Nits:
> 
> Section 1: please avoid splitting "I/S-PMSI" across multiple lines.
> 
> Section 2: s/ingress PE's default label space/default label space/
> 
> Section 2: s/packet's ingress PE/ingress PE of the packet/
> 
> Section 2.2.2.1: s/Route-2 respectively/Route-2, respectively/
> 
> Section 3.2: s/PTA's Label field/label field of the PTA/
> 
> Section 3.2: s/source PE's label space/label space of the source PE/
> 
> Section 4: s/third party's label space/label space of a third party/ (2 
> places)
> 
> Section 4: please spell out "LFIBs"; this term is not in the definitions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> last-call mailing list
> last-c...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to