Hi Jean, Yes, this would be fine. Thank you.
Regards, Dan On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 5:18 PM A. Jean Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > The co-chair said that Gen-ART could have another week or two to turn in a > review. Is that sufficient? > > Thanks! > > Jean > > On 11/17/23 12:02 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > I will ask the AD and chairs if they'd be willing to extend the deadline > given the length of the doc and the intervening IETF meeting. > > Thanks! > Jean > > > On 11/16/23 4:46 PM, Dan Romascanu wrote: > > Hi Jean, > > I have pushed the Accept button, but there is no chance that I can stand > by the 11/21 deadline. It's already 11/17 in my time zone, and even if I do > nothing but Gen-ART reviewing, there is no chance I can read, understand > and meaningfully comment on a 200+ pages document defining a new protocol. > I will need at least one extra week, probably more. > > If any of the Gen-ART colleagues believes that they can do better, please > step in. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:47 PM Jean Mahoney via Datatracker < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Last Call review of: draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol (no specific > version) > Deadline: 2023-11-21 > Pages: 225 > Requested by: (System) > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol/reviewrequest/18421/login/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol/reviewrequest/18421/login/> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol/reviewrequest/18421/login/> > > Jean Mahoney has assigned Dan Romascanu as a reviewer for this > document. > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
