Hi Russ,
Thank you for your review.
On 08/03/2024 16:29, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-messagelimit-08
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2024-03-08
IETF LC End Date: 2024-03-25
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major Concerns:
None
Minor Concerns:
This document contains the disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work. Is this
because it builds upon the capability defined in RFC 3501? If so, then
you can ignore this concern. If it is something else, then I would like
to see a rationale in the document, even if it is put in a place that
will not be part of the final RFC.
Yes, I think some text was copied.
Nits:
IDnits reports:
** There are 13 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest
one being 23 characters in excess of 72.
At lease one of these long lines was a problem for me as a reader.
I suspect that all of the long lines are in the C:/S: examples.
I will sot this out with RFC Editor.
I do not see the point of an Index at the back of the document that only
has one entry.
Right, will remove.
Best Regards,
Alexey
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
