Ack Dan, I'll put some words to that effect.
Many thanks!
Pascal

Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 21:16, Dan Romascanu <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Hi Pascal,
>
> Thank you for your response. This makes sense to me, with one observation.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:11 PM Pascal Thubert <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> 2. The deployment and backwards compatibility sections are quite good, but is
>> there a recommended strategy for updating existing deployments in the field?
>>
>> This specification introduces a new MoP (14.5.
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-16#section-14.5>New
>> RPL Mode of Operation
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-16#name-new-rpl-mode-of-operation>)
>> . This means that you cannot update a live network. You have to create a
>> new instance with MoP 5 and migrate nodes to that instance by allowing them
>> to join it. MoPs a re tradictional RPL since RFC 6550, meaning that the
>> behavior is already known outside of this specification.
>>
>>
>> With the other hat that I sometimes wear, the one of an OPS-DIR reviewer,
> I would say that this needs to be clarified in an Operational
> Considerations statement.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>

-- 
Pascal
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to