Ack Dan, I'll put some words to that effect. Many thanks! Pascal Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 21:16, Dan Romascanu <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi Pascal, > > Thank you for your response. This makes sense to me, with one observation. > > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:11 PM Pascal Thubert <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> 2. The deployment and backwards compatibility sections are quite good, but is >> there a recommended strategy for updating existing deployments in the field? >> >> This specification introduces a new MoP (14.5. >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-16#section-14.5>New >> RPL Mode of Operation >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-16#name-new-rpl-mode-of-operation>) >> . This means that you cannot update a live network. You have to create a >> new instance with MoP 5 and migrate nodes to that instance by allowing them >> to join it. MoPs a re tradictional RPL since RFC 6550, meaning that the >> behavior is already known outside of this specification. >> >> >> With the other hat that I sometimes wear, the one of an OPS-DIR reviewer, > I would say that this needs to be clarified in an Operational > Considerations statement. > > Regards, > > Dan > > -- Pascal
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
