Thank you Roni for the review of the draft. FYI: We have addressed your comments in the revised draft.
HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-12.html Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-12 Thanks again, Rakesh On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 11:46 PM Roni Even via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > Document: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2024-09-01 > IETF LC End Date: 2024-09-06 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > The document is ready to be published as a standard track rFC with nits > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > In section 4.2.2 first paragraph “ the response messages are preferred to > be > sent back in-band on the same link ” do you mean “the response messages > SHOULD > be sent …” > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
