Steven Bingler <[email protected]> writes: > Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 12:09:33 -0400
My apologies for not responding sooner. All of my concerns have been addressed. In theory, I'd like to see the character-set issues handled according to a more consistent theory, but we need to be upward-compatible with reality, and that makes theoretical consistency impossible. > You can find all the changes in the latest draft, > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis, > plus a recent small commit: > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/59f5e21e84e19ba81eae5484a22a2ed8dec9f445 The latest changes do improve a number of points. I only comment on an oddity: the version at https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/blob/main/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis.md does not have the section numbers, which can make it hard to track references to e.g. "section 4.1.1". Dale _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
