Document: draft-ietf-pce-flexible-grid
Title: PCEP Extension for Flexible Grid Networks
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Not Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-flexible-grid-16

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2026-08-30
IETF LC End Date: 2026-09-01
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Not ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC

It's been awhile since I've tried to load all of PCEP into my head - apologies
if any of this off base.

My primary issue:

The document is currently using the wrong kind of error, claiming "a PathErr
MUST be generated" but what it lays out isn't PCEP - it appears to be taken
from RSVP. If I'm right, addressing this will have quite a bit of impact on
what's being asked of IANA, and will likely change the prose of the discussions
of errors enough that deeper review should wait until after that is addressed.

Other concerns:

Consider being a bit more descriptive with where in a PCEP PCRep or PCUpd
message the TLV object described in section 5 is intended to occur. I _think_
it's aimed towards hop-by-hop and if so, are length constraints going to be a
problem?

Why does the document limit frequency slots to >=193.1 THz? That is, why does
section 4.1's discussion of FSA restrict n to be non-negative? RFC7698 does not.

Should these objects be richer in describing the requested slot width? I can
see how a minimum width can be expressed as a constraint, but that's not the
same as a desired width.

The text talking about the Count and Link Identifiers fields in section 4.9
reads badly when the link identifiers are the ends of ranges. Consider being
more precise about "link identifier record" or something similar..



_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to