Hey,
El lun, 22-12-2008 a las 20:15 -0500, Sebastien Pouliot escribió:
> On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 20:02 +0800, Cedric Vivier wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Néstor Salceda
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It's okey to commit? What do you think?
> >
> > Nice idea,
>
> ditto
Thanks guys!
> > it would be even nicer i think if we link, not to the absolute path
> > but to the relative path, so that it can also work in http://
> > (build-server/browse-source integration) and network file-sharing
> > scenarios (where the full path on the system on which was generated
> > may not be valid from the local machine).
>
> That too is a nice idea ;-) but I'm not sure if it is an easy one from
> the stylesheet point of view.
Well, I have thought about this, and I have a possible solution. For
the users who runs gendarme against their assemblies, the first solution
could be valid.
For other users, we could use the reporter tool I wrote for this summer
of code, and write an action which replaces an address for another one
in the xml file (we should change only the <defect> tag and the Source
attribute). And later generate the html with the stylesheet.
What do you think?
Néstor.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Gendarme" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
