On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 3:08 AM, "Andrés G. Aragoneses" <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hey! Good rule, I've always wanted to write it. Just one comment: > Thanks, > > Cedric Vivier wrote: > > Use 'using' statement (or a try/finally block) to guarantee local > > disposal even in the event an uncatched exception occurs. > > Aren't we language-agnostic? I would specify that the using keyword *if* > using C#, or try-catch blocks if not. I don't remember now if VB.NET has > a counterpart on it. "using" on an IDisposable exists on C#, VB.NET, Boo, Nemerle, and probably others. So I guess it's pretty much language-agnostic in the .NET world. The solution message already proposes "or a try/finally block" (which is the pattern to use, not try/catch). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gendarme" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
