I don't really know how this all works, but I noticed in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Netball_in_the_Cook_Islands/GA1 page you linked it mentioned this: "If you feel that this assessment was in error, you may take it to WP:GAR<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GAR>. "
is that an option? do/could they have another person review it who might have more ideas to help you get it to GA? (or if not this link is there another) > Back to my reviewer, I'd rather he had failed > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Netball/GA1 the article like the > reviewer failed > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Netball_in_the_Cook_Islands/GA1 because > while the Cook Islands one was a quick fail, the reviewer offered clear > examples, good feedback than can be worked towards improving based on the > examples, didn't drag it out and followed the procedure. > > It would be of great assistance if you could actually step in to that > discussion, examine what we said and actually help improve the article to > get it to good status based on the criteria that the reviewer provided. > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
