> However, I also do worry about double standards. For example, earlier > somewhere someone suggested we visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ochre > where a barebreasted woman was used to illustrate the use of it as a > body paint in Africa. I made the point that I really would like to know > if men were painted and if the penis also was painted on men. Something > tells me under that rule someone might have jumped all over me for > "innuendo" since innuendo is in the mind of the behold. I actually in my > mind had a heavy innuendo intention, but objectively speaking it > probably didn't look that way. Others might have seen it as more of an > innuendo than even I meant. > > So bottom line, whether or not it's debated, i think a little more > detail needs to be added to make it clear that strong and intentional > innuendo is a problem.
Yes, sexual innuendo is a rather ambiguous term, although certain expressions obviously fall within its definition, and not just in the mind of the beholder. Fred _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
