On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Sarah Stierch <[email protected]>wrote:
> This is a NSFW photo.... > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Korean_Vulva2.jpg > > Five for deletion, two for keep. This is its third nomination. > > An admin came in today and declared it being kept because "No valid reason > for deletion, per previous decisions. Person is not recognizable." It has > been nominated twice, by anon IP's who have simply declared "porn" or > "obscene" as the deletion reason (not enough of a reason). > > I nominated it, like I do many things, because it was unused on any project > since its upload in March of 2009, it's uneducational, and the poor > description proves that. I also think it's poor quality - if we need an > "educational photo of a vulva" we have two really fab ones on the [[vulva]] > article. Which of course was argued (a nude photo of a headless woman blow > drying her hair in heels with the blow dryer cord and shadow in the shot.. > come...on...), and as FloNight noted, we can probably have some high quality > photos of a nude woman using a blow dryer that aren't taken in the bedroom > for the project..if it's that in demand. > <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Korean_Vulva2.jpg> > I'd be concerned about this user's track record of uploads, this the only one not deleted: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jonghap Presumably if there is/was File:Korean Vulva3.jpg and File:Korean Vulva2.jpg, then there was File:Korean Vulva1.jpg which is gone now. On copyright issues alone, I am concerned about this image, as well as regarding consent, given the private location of the photo. Cheers, Katie Cheers, Katie > > I shouldn't even act surprised...I guess.. :-/ > > Were the reasons we provided not valid enough? Can you even challenge > something like this? Did I miss something? Am I doing this wrong? Regardless > of the subject, I don't understand why the admin would declare the peoples > reasons in valid based on my knowledge of the Commons policies...: "Commons > is not a porn site", "private location, lack of model release" etc... > > (And yes, I was a little snappy on my nomination (this was my original > rager when I nominated a bunch of stuff from the "high heels" > category..)...so no need to reprimand me....I've curbed my 'tude!) > > Any help would be great, > > Sarah > > -- > GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia > Foundation<http://www.glamwiki.org> > Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American > Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch> > and > Sarah Stierch Consulting > *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.* > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://www.sarahstierch.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > -- President, Wiki Society of Washington, DC Inc. http://wikidc.org @wikidc / @wikimania2012
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
