http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/fashion/students-startup-weaves-a-web-that-keeps-growing-20110914-1k9hi.html


  ''If you look at Wikipedia, a lot of the [fashion] designer or brand pages do 
not have a lot of information on them, and Wikipedia does not really focus on 
images, so you will not ever find the new collections or [fashion] look books 
on there,'' she says. 

  ''At the moment, there is no central database for fashion, a location where a 
girl can find the latest look book for Marc Jacobs or the first collection for 
Chanel. Either they are not there or they are on a host of different websites, 
so we want 
  to create all of that in one place.''
  Sarah Stierch says:

  ...uh..it's called Style.com and it's the greatest fashion website, ever, and 
has been for almost ten years. (Always makes me laugh that people in the 
fashion world forget men are as into fashion as much as women are, too!) 

  And I comment:

  Given my experience with Wikipedia's fashion coverage, I think I can speak to 
this with some authority.

  We did create a little external-link template for style.com: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Style.com_collection, that can be used as 
you would use the Facebook, Twitter or MySpace templates. It's, as Sarah says, 
an excellent resource.

  I don't mind the idea of the look-book thing-we could and should arguably 
have articles on notable designers' biannual collections, and there would thus 
inevitably be associated Commons categories, which would serve as look books.

  What we'd need-and this, it seems to me, is where wikifashion is failing-is 
someone who can take those pictures with a decent enough camera and can get 
access to the shows. Someone with some professional experience as a fashion 
photographer (cue Steely Dan's "Peg", from the now-deleted "Songs about 
fashion" category: "When the shutter falls / You see it all in 3-D / It's your 
favorite foreign movie ..."), in other words.

  The problem, though, is that these people are not usually open to 
freely-licensing their work. And even, I suppose, a Wikipedian with the skill 
set might not necessarily be welcome at a fashion show, not if it was known 
that they were going to create images that would undermine the commercial value 
of the work of every other photographer there.

  But, then again, we did get people into sporting events eventually, so I'm 
sure we'll eventually get someone into a fashion show or two.

  Daniel Case

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to