> It seems from my experience that WP:RD2 is usually interpreted fairly > narrowly, at least in the cases I've tried to use it. Specifically it > requires the material to be "grossly" offensive and excludes "'ordinary' > incivility". In the world of Wikipedia, grossly offensive is a pretty > high bar it seems. Right now, I have a hard time even convincing people > that this sort of stuff is incivil, much less worthy of revision > deletion. > > My favorite example is the Talk Page for Rubyfruit Jungle. It took 4 > years, 10 editors, and a couple of edit wars to remove a joke posted by > an anonymous IP about vaginas smelling like fish. > > Ryan Kaldari
It is the responsibility of administrators to apply WP:RD2 fairly and appropriately. Fred _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
