Next time you decide to be angry at someone, first check if the ideas you angry at BELONGS TO THE PERSON IN QUESTION.
I already said 1 million times that you make up some ideas and give them to me, and I DON'T SUBSCRIBE THEM - AT ALL. So please, next time, go create a problem with someone else. _____ *Béria Lima* Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt> (351) 963 953 042 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer.* On 1 October 2011 22:45, Maggie <[email protected]> wrote: > @Beria > > Oh my god, feminism is all about being equal--it's called egalitarianism. > > I've been "attacking" or "ganging up" on you because you were rude, sexist, > and said things that made me extremely angry. I don't really care about the > OP's post to be honest--and I didn't agree with all of it. But this is about > what you said. It made me angry. It made me angry that a woman said > this--effectively saying that because women are not readily visible in these > issues, their opinions are invalid. That was how I understood it. And how > you personally feel on the issue is irrelevant. JUST because a woman is not > commenting on an issue doesn't mean she isn't offended by it. There are only > 9% of women on WP after all. Perhaps women don't mind, but there is not an > appropriate representation of the real-world population of women, and you > are saying because the 9% of women in the minority are not "screaming to > tear apart images" then obviously women are not against it. What an ignorant > assumption. That is ignoring any opinion of any woman who uses WP. > > Then the irony of it all--several men tell me to calm down in a matter of > ways. > > I could also say more things about anti-feminist women, and how they always > behave the same way--but I won't stuff your mailboxes with anymore of this. > Just remember, men: when a woman is offended by something she's allowed to > voice those complaints, and it doesn't have to be productive by your > standards. > > --Maggie > > Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 21:50:47 +0100 >> From: B?ria Lima <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 3 >> To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects >> <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> < >> caa2xhja3n0rnomzo7zfeed7bttbyqihxh++omm+e_pq1+nn...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> Please see Theo's post in answer to one of yours. And read my mails. I'm >> not >> sexist. Not towards mans, not towards womans as well. I'm NOT a feminist, >> true, but I'm not paternalist as well, I believe we all should be equals >> and >> be threaded that way. >> >> You really should read my mail again, I have the feeling that you didn't >> understand a bit of what I said since you continue to "give me" ideas I do >> not subscribe at all. >> >> PS.: Would be good if you keep the name of the treads you're answering. >> Answer to "Digest" mails break the treads and makes everything a mess. >> _____ >> *B?ria Lima* >> Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt> >> (351) 963 953 042 >> >> *Imagine um mundo onde ? dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter >> livre >> acesso ao somat?rio de todo o conhecimento humano. ? isso o que estamos a >> fazer.* >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
