> A bit rude are we? It would have been more useful to simply mention the > other list, which I clearly was not aware of. Also, "discussion followed > on > whether this is a positive development, and whether a number of other > divisions will (or should) spring up after this." > > If anyone really would like to complain that this is sexist or not useful > in > creating a friendlier environment to women, then so be it, but these > groups > will exist either way. Because minority groups need to exist this moment > in > time for people to feel more comfortable in their own domains. This has > consistently shown positive results with in diverse populations. Far in > the > future, when equality is achieved for all people, perhaps these types of > groups will be null and void. > > The Gender Gap list will remain and allow for men to participate with > women > anyway, so it's no biggie. > > --Maggie
Yes, I agree. Fred _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap