Hi folks, I'm wondering if anyone here has examples of articles that contain potentially-objectionable imagery being significantly improved following normal discussion among editors?
I'm looking for examples of good editorial judgment being exercised in the normal article improvement processes -- like, an upskirt image being removed from the 'skirt' article, or, commercial porn being replaced by images that are more informative/educational. That kind of thing. I know that kind of editing happens all the time -- I'm hoping people here can point me towards particularly good examples. Thanks, Sue -- Sue Gardner Executive Director Wikimedia Foundation 415 839 6885 office 415 816 9967 cell Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
