On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > Follow up to my own post of new thoughts... The idea of follow-on > effects from improvements in project atmosphere is one that can be > extended. We could, for instance, view the controversial content issue > as a symptom of a community imbalance that could be improved > indirectly and with less resistance than the "direct approach" image > filter.
Hi Nathan! After you volunteered to help with the grant to help develop a pilot program to increase female participation on Wikimedia Foundation projects, I was looking forward to working with you. The time is ticking in terms of how much time we have left to complete t the grant. I haven't heard back from you, and after your standing up and volunteering to be the 0.1% of the 93% that will actively work towards this goal, I'm puzzled. Are you no longer interested in working on the project? Your e-mails to me were so enthusiastic about the project. :( I can't do that on my own as I didn't really have the time… and you were so understanding of the need for assistance via e-mail. What's going on? -- twitter: purplepopple blog: ozziesport.com
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
