You do realize that Wikipedia is a horrible way to get into the news? From, Emily
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Karen Sue Rolph <[email protected]>wrote: > Wikipedia colleagues, > > I want to work within the accepted range of who rises to the level of > notable women. The historical problem of women in the news less, and > quoted and cited less, is still an issue. I want to mention an important > figure, who may otherwise stay out of the news. Please see her page - > Michelle Clayman. > > While Ms. Clayman is in investments, and for that reason may stay out of > the limelight, without her philanthropy at the Clayman Institute for Gender > Studies, an amazing body of research may have never happened. The scale is > global, and her funding support includes game-changing and > paradigm-upending research such as "The Motherhood Penalty" and a number of > projects focused abroad. Ms. Clayman should (NPOV) be noted for providing > the framework, funding, and vision to support research on women's > struggles. I've gone ahead and marked the page as a Stanford wiki and/or > women's history project; links to the Institute and additional activities > are a good idea. > > KS Rolph > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
