hm, reading the threads in the list archive is an option that I often use, too, and it is independent of any mail program ;-)
example, by thread, this month: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2012-June/thread.html :-) cheers Claudia On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:50:17 +0100, Andreas Kolbe wrote > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Karen Sue Rolph > <karenro...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > > Dear esteemed colleagues, > > > > <snip> > > > I recently referred to Anita S. I don't know her, don't know how she > > would be contacted, Andreas. I don't know if she contributes to Wikipedia, > > even. Anyone who might have weighed in without first exploring the nature > > of her work missed it's essence. Evidence is useful to this forum and its > > mission. > > > > KSRolph > > > > Dear Karen, > > I have contacted Anita, and hope she will have time to look in. > > (As for the threading of topics, I suspect that gmail handles the thread > structure better than hotmail. In gmail, all the posts that belong to a > given topic always appear together, in one long list, so it's easier to see > what preceded any given post.) > > Best, > Andreas _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
