On Jul 6, 2012 10:56 AM, "Gillian White" <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > I think we should ignore sexual > orientation on THIS one as it is irrelevant > for addressing the the lack of female > participation in Wikmedia projects.
I agree, mostly, but. . my understanding is that the surveys (ignoring the faults in them) indicate LGBT may actually be over-represented in wikimedia when compared to the distribution expected by real-world population studies; in both men and women. Im not saying this is bad, but that it does not appear that there is a LGBT systemic gap that needs a strategic approach to solving. I would love to hear of more research on this wrt women, as it could help steer our gender gap solution finding efforts. > Otherwise I want a list for people who > identify as celibate. Hehe. I can imagine that, like the gendergap list full of men(mea culpa; ora pro me) , list being dominated by sexually active people trying to 'help' the celibate.
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
