So, what are the questions? From, Emily
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote: > To me it seems beneficial to have a broadly accessible opportunity to > formulate and answer questions about self-identified women on Wikipedia. > The benefit is in empowering researchers and our community to pursue > interesting questions -- but by definition, we don't know what the > questions are yet :) > > -Pete > [[User:Peteforsyth]] > > On Sep 24, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote: > > > On 9/24/12 3:37 PM, Emily Monroe wrote: > >> So. The implications of this. Good, bad, or does it really achieve > anything? > >> > >> From, > >> Emily > > > > I'm not sure if there really is any good or bad implication, so to say. > All it shows is that, in theory, there are approximately 1700 people in > English Wikipedia who may identify as a female. > > > > I wonder how many of these editors are active. > > > > -Sarah > > > > -- > > Sarah Stierch > > _______________________________________________ > > Gendergap mailing list > > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
