There are plenty! She was notable before this incident happened. She's been covered/interviewed in /multiple secondary reliable sources/.

-Sarah
/who always likes a challenge.


On 3/30/13 12:58 PM, Emily Monroe wrote:
On the other hand, we need a secondary source that is more reliable than Facebook or Twitter.

From,
Emily


On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Jane Darnell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Awesome! Nice article. I think she is OK on the notability front.
    Anyone who manages to accumulate more than 4 million *science*
    followers on facebook without posting regularly on sexual subjects is
    definitely noteworthy enough for Wikipedia. Add to that this strange
    development on the swear-word gender miscommunication and you pass on
    the basis of "most bizarre gendergap content to be published in 2013".

    2013/3/30, Ilona Buchem <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>:
    > Hi Sarah,
    >
    > I am following this discussion and it's interesting to see that
    deciding
    > about an entry is not straight-forward even to "core insiders".
    I wonder
    > what criteria help decide if something or someone is "worth" an
    article
    > in WP. How do you decide? Or: What makes it worth it or nor?
    >
    > -Ilona
    >
    > Am 3/30/13 5:17 PM, schrieb Sarah Stierch:
    >> Oh Michael, the bearer of bad news about people who generally
    want to
    >> write new articles on this mailing list.
    >>
    >> Is there another article where we think this type of coverage or
    >> content could be placed? I think we could even build an article
    about
    >> I Fucking Love Science instead.
    >>
    >> I still question if it's officially not worth an article, I haven't
    >> researched it yet. But, at this point I'm a "pro" at making people
    >> most declare non-notable rather notable based on research. (Oh the
    >> curator in me!)
    >>
    >> -Sarah
    >>
    >> On 3/30/13 6:08 AM, Michael J. Lowrey wrote:
    >>> It's appalling and depressing; but if somebody were to write a
    >>> Wikipedia article about it, at this point, I'd say it fails
    WP:NOTNEWS.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Jane Darnell
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    >>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>     Did anyone see this? A popular blogger on Science (with
    more than 4
    >>>     million followers) is a woman. The woman herself, Elise
    Andrew,
    >>>     had no
    >>>     idea it was a secret, and she was "outed" when she
    announced her
    >>>     twitter account featuring a picture of herself. Apparently
    the bias
    >>>     occurred because of the swear word on her facebook page
    which made
    >>>     readers assume she was a man. Interesting conclusion! This
    is a
    >>>     facebook hype that deserves a WP page, no?
    >>>
    >>>     article is here:
    >>>
    >>>
    
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/us-news-blog/2013/mar/20/i-love-science-woman-facbook
    >>>     facebook page here:
    >>> http://www.facebook.com/IFeakingLoveScience
    >>>     The TV interview with Dr. Michio Kaku on CBS morning show
    is here:
    >>> http://cbsn.ws/109mAEL
    >>>
    >>> _______________________________________________
    >>>     Gendergap mailing list
    >>> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> Michael J. "Orange Mike" Lowrey
    >>>
    >>> "When I get a little money I buy books; and if any is left, I buy
    >>> food and clothes."
    >>>      --  Desiderius Erasmus
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> _______________________________________________
    >>> Gendergap mailing list
    >>> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
    >>
    >>
    >> --
    >> *Sarah Stierch*
    >> */Museumist and open culture advocate/*
    >> >>Visit sarahstierch.com <http://sarahstierch.com>
    <http://sarahstierch.com><<
    >>
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Gendergap mailing list
    >> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
    >
    >
    >

    _______________________________________________
    Gendergap mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap




_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


--
*Sarah Stierch*
*/Museumist and open culture advocate/*
>>Visit sarahstierch.com <http://sarahstierch.com><<
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to