hi,

actually there were two questions. one was if a vote about the topic (have
a rule for gender-something in articles) makes sense. a 3:1 majority says:
no. the main reason is "do not patronise the autor." and the second
question was if people do support the proposal or not. the proposed rule
itself proposes a classical language. with no surprise after the result of
the first question, a lot less answered here. a 2:1 majority says: no, this
rule should not be like proposed.

rupert.



On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote:

> I was just talking about this yesterday - In the Dutch Wikipedia,
> gender-neutral language is used for occupations and during the
> Art&Feminism edit-a-thon we remarked on how difficult it is to track
> down female artists if the lead sentence is gender neutral. This is
> compounded by the fact that the Dutch Wikipedia does not allow gender
> categories at all (which does solve the "Ghettoization" problem we
> constantly have in the English Wikipedia where women are in the "Women
> <skill>" categories rather than the main categories). In the English
> Wikipedia we also only have gender-neutral languages for most
> occupations, but that is because we discarded gender-based words so
> long ago (poet vs. poetess).
>
> 2014-02-02, Kevin Gorman <[email protected]>:
> > Hi Bob -
> >
> > Unfortunately I both don't speak German, and don't have the time to go
> > through a long and messy RfC on the subject in a language I don't
> > understand currently.  However the issue as it has been framed in your
> > original post certainly sounds concerning.  If you have the time (and I
> > certainly understand if you dont,) would you be willing to provide a
> > slightly more in depth summary fo what's going on currently.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin Gorman
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to