Please moderate or even remove access to this list. Risker
On 18 November 2014 16:52, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Yeah, I don't see how this is at all relevant to the gender gap. Please > moderate the sender. > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:27 PM, George Herbert <george.herb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> I was going back and forth on speaking up myself, but I concur. >> >> George William Herbert >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Nov 18, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello the moderators, I think the legal threats implied in this e-mail >> (and the other) are sufficient to warrant moderating the sender. >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Dear Mr. Davies >>> >>> From >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee#Members >>> I observe you are an "inactive" Member of this alleged committee. I >>> hence suspect that your email is bogus. >>> >>> Accordingly I would appreciate receiving a signed email, or even a >>> scanned signed email clearly given on behalf of the Arbitration >>> Committee listing its physical address for service of legal process. >>> >>> I am shocked by the casual and secretive approach adopted to such >>> concerns of child pornography, especially when it was previously made >>> on another website http://wikipediocracy.com, naming 2 of your users >>> "Sitush" and "Bishonen" using sexually colored language and referring >>> to child pornography on your website. This Sitush is a serial stalker >>> and harasser of female Wikipedia editors as your Arbcom knows well.. >>> >>> It is certainly strange that I was blocked as a sock puppet at the >>> instance of these same 2 users (1 of whom is your Admin) when I >>> brought that message to their attention. It seems Wikipedia actively >>> discourages reporting such sexual harassment to Admins and wipes out >>> all trace of it from public gaze, to the extent of terminating the >>> account of the person who reported me for being an alleged >>> sockpuppet.. >>> >>> It is even stranger that you will not disclose / specify the multiple >>> accounts and IPs I am accused of using as an alleged sock puppet or >>> why I am accused of being an India Against Corruption sockpuppet when >>> I have never edited any page concerned with that body. It is very >>> strange that Arbcom will not comply with its own policies for this. . >>> >>> It is clear that the Arbcom is covering up the actions of its >>> anonymous users implicated in child pornography by another website. >>> >>> I urge you to reconsider as I firmly intend to pursue this matter and >>> investigate all your own antecedents on your inactions.. >>> >>> On 11/19/14, Roger Davies <roger.davies.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Romana Busse: >>> > >>> > This is to acknowledge receipt of your emails of yesterday and today. >>> > >>> > The Arbitration Committee is unable to assist you further in this >>> > matter. Any further communications should be sent to: >>> > >>> > le...@wikimedia.org >>> > >>> > Roger Davies >>> > Arbitration Committee >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On 18/11/2014 15:41, Romana Busse wrote: >>> >> Dear Anthony (AGK) >>> >> >>> >> I'm very sorry to bother you, but could I have a timeline with respect >>> >> to deletion, or not, of those images ? >>> >> >>> >> With the welfare of the children in mind, I feel that the school, the >>> >> children's parents and the local child welfare committees, magistrates >>> >> and police should be properly sensitized to the incidents of that >>> >> day, and to ensure it cannot reoccur >>> >> >>> >> I'm sure the police and the Indian Govt Cyber Advisory Committee would >>> >> be interested in learning from you or NYBrad the finer points of law >>> >> whereby Citizendium encyclopedia decides to completely wipes out the >>> >> images within 12 hours but Wikipedia has not done anything till now on >>> >> identical complaint. >>> >> >>> >> I would also like to know by when you will publish across all >>> >> Wikipedia projects the complete list of accounts and IPs I have >>> >> allegedly used, and also if I am a sockpuppet of User:MehulWB as >>> >> alleged or not. This is required by your same policy WP:SOCK under >>> >> which was blocked. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks >>> >> >>> >> On 11/18/14, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> This is about a potential threat to clearly identifiable Indian minor >>> >>> school children whose images are retained on WMF servers in USA and >>> >>> India despite legal notice to remove them. >>> >>> Taken within their school (where their parents expected the same >>> >>> degree of privacy as they enjoy at home) and uploaded without their >>> >>> permission, consent or knowledge, at a location where they allegedly >>> >>> viewed grossly obscene pornography accessed on a Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> service which has now been disabled on complaint by a body called >>> >>> [[India Against Corruption]]. >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> ArbCom-appeals-en mailing list >>> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BASC >>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/arbcom-appeals-en >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gendergap mailing list >>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
