On Nov 27, 2014 9:55 AM, "Carol Moore dc" <[email protected]> wrote: > The study's talk page has ongoing discussions of people being annoyed about > this issue. Probably first place any updates will show up: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editor_Survey_2012
I wrote there: > See [http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/the-wikipedia-gender-gap-revisited Mako's > study] which includes the initial numbers from before his changes. I thought > the study results were already released by the time he did the study but > maybe I'm wrong. Anyway at least there are numbers. But IMHO absolute numbers > are not as important as change rates over time. (which has been the topic of > debate among researchers not too long ago also) --~~~~ -Jeremy P.S. haven't read the arbcom case or any of the onwiki discussion but I generally support points I've seen on these threads from Sarah Stierch. P.P.S. Everyone who is having turkey, etc. today should enjoy it. :) _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
