I agree, i pretty much knew that the ggtf stuff wkuld hitbthe news somewhere.
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE device ------ Original message------ From: Carol Moore dc Date: Thu, Dec 11, 2014 9:01 PM To: Addressing gender equity and exploring ways to increase the participation of women within Wikimedia projects.; Subject:Re: [Gendergap] ya'll are in slate On 12/11/2014 6:13 PM, Risker wrote: > Well, I suppose the Arbitration Committee will now figure out why I > thought the case name should be changed. > > Risker/Anne > The name is accurate. It was the interactions at GGTF that started the hullabaloo. The Arbitration committee was coming out against it until someone brought SPECIFICO's harassment of me to ANI, several GGTF people got up to document/complain about it happening at GGTF, and SPECIFICO got interaction banned. At that point Sitush went crazy, screaming about outing and researching me, site banning me, writing the bio, which ended up with and Misc for Deletion and an ANI. Suddenly Arbitration comittee decided "GGTF" was important enough. Like Sitush, did enough Arbitrators think these WOMEN (and their supporters) were getting just TOO uppity and getting males in trouble for their mere boys will be boys (harassment) behavior? Remember a couple of them were convinced by some liars that GGTF was strongly behind the proposal that a woman's edits only could be reverted by TWO male editors? It took several people with diffs to disabuse them of that notion!!! So this really was very much about GGTF and interactions there. CM _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
