GW, accusing me of hijacking this list for a "vendetta" is a purely untrue and
petty accusation. For the last couple of years my goal on the project has been
to make it more fair for all editors regardless of status (admin or editor),
gender, race, etc.
Well, I’m glad you got some of this very pure fight for fairness in around the
harassment you were leveraging against other editors. I’ve spoken out against
this behavior because I don’t think people engaging in email harassment
campaigns against editors such as myself should be allowed on this list any
more than they should be allowed on Wikipedia. There has been discussion on
this list recently about how there are so few women (and so few people of any
gender) running for the Arbitration Committee, and meanwhile one of the ones
helping to keep it an incredibly thankless and often unpleasant place to be is
continuing to do so on the very same list.
With that said, of the 2 of us, which one is responsible for participating in
banning Carol, participating in setting in motion the series of events that
have lead not only many discussion on this list but on Wikipediocracy and now
news articles as well? Here's a hint, its not me.
If you read the proposed decision, you’ll see that I did not vote for this. If
my participation in the case—where I voted against banning Carol—makes me
“responsible for participating in banning Carol,” then we’ll have to agree to
disagree.
— Molly (GorillaWarfare)
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
