It might be a reprint but every reprint brings it to a new audience. In this case, SBS is an Australian government broadcaster whose charter is "to provide multilingual and multicultural radio and television services that inform, educate and entertain all Australians and, in doing so, reflect Australia's multicultural society". So it has a charter and an audience that cares about diversity. I would suspect Wikipedia donors are likely to be disproportionately part of that audience, and, yes, the donation campaign banner ads are running here at the moment.
So, reprint or not, having it picked up by SBS isn't such good news. Kerry _____ From: gendergap-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:gendergap-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Risker Sent: Wednesday, 17 December 2014 4:06 AM To: Addressing gender equity and exploring ways to increase the participationof women within Wikimedia projects. Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Australian article about recent onwiki drama It's just a reprint of the Slate article. Risker/Anne On 16 December 2014 at 11:09, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> wrote: http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/12/14/comment-will-editing-disputes- mean-end-wikipedia -- Sarah Stierch ----- Diverse and engaging consulting for your organization. www.sarahstierch.com <http://www.sarahstierch.com/> _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
