On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote: > am i right in thinking that for legal reasons we need to > include the complete license text in every source file (rather than just > the short form)? > My recollection is that you are correct ... we need to be using the long form, at least for the version 1.1 license (i.e. the current one). > - robert Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [ANN] xml-commons-which: new Which utility to replac... shane_curcuru
- Re: [ANN] xml-commons-which: new Which utility ... Kevin A. Burton
- Re: [ANN] xml-commons-which: new Which utility ... Sudipta Sarkar
- is a statement of the license in all source... robert burrell donkin
- Re: is a statement of the license in al... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: is a statement of the license i... James Strachan
- Re: is a statement of the lice... Jon Scott Stevens
- Re: is a statement of the ... James Strachan
- Re: is a statement of the license in al... Peter Donald
