My only issue and I guess this is directed more at you Jon, is it doesn't give me a clear idea about "what we want". Can you give me a good idea and I'll be glad to submit a patch to that effect. It just seems like we should be asking for something and being specific.
-Andy On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 17:53, Paulo Gaspar wrote: > Sometimes I (argh!) love Jon! > =;o) > > Paulo > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:07 PM > > To: Jakarta General List > > Subject: RE: [Fwd: cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml] > > > > > > Why is that? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:10 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Fwd: cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml] > > > > > > > > > I'm not comfortable with carrying this type of editorial > > > matter at the top of the home page, and would like to move it > > > to the news and status page. > > > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml > > > Date: 30 Jan 2002 21:53:04 -0000 > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Reply-To: "Jakarta WebSite CVS List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > jon 02/01/30 13:53:04 > > > > > > Modified: docs index.html > > > xdocs index.xml > > > Log: > > > lets have a little fun. > > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.52 +32 -0 jakarta-site2/docs/index.html > > > > > > Index: index.html > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/docs/index.html,v > > > retrieving revision 1.51 > > > retrieving revision 1.52 > > > diff -u -r1.51 -r1.52 > > > --- index.html 29 Jan 2002 01:47:06 -0000 1.51 > > > +++ index.html 30 Jan 2002 21:53:03 -0000 1.52 > > > @@ -140,6 +140,38 @@ > > > > > > <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%"> > > > <tr><td bgcolor="#525D76"> > > > <font color="#ffffff" face="arial,helvetica,sanserif"> > > > + <a name="That flaming fireball in the > > > sky..."><strong>That > > > flaming fireball in the sky...</strong></a> > > > + </font> > > > + </td></tr> > > > + <tr><td> > > > + <blockquote> > > > + <p> > > > +In a recent <a > > > href="http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=Sun > > > Interview">article</a>, > > > Karen Tegan, Director of J2EE Compatibility and Platform > > > +Services for Sun Microsystems, had the following to say: > > > +</p> > > > + <p> > > > +"The J2EE Compatible brand has achieved significant > > > momentum over the > > > +past two years, and we want to make sure that any open > > > source efforts > > > +don't impact the viability of that effort." > > > +</p> > > > + <p> > > > +In other words, Sun doesn't give a hoot about whether J2EE > > > licensing > > > +restricts open source J2EE products (in case you missed > > > it, it does). > > > +Thus, the Apache Software Foundation's involvement in the > > > Java Community > > > +Process (JCP) is simply an advertising statement for Sun > > > to claim that > > > +they have a 'vision which uses open standards and non-proprietary > > > +interfaces'. If you would like to express your opinions of Sun's > > > +licensing terms, feel free to contact <a > > > href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a> and let us > > > know what you > > > +think. Thanks. > > > +</p> > > > + </blockquote> > > > + </p> > > > + </td></tr> > > > + <tr><td><br/></td></tr> > > > + </table> > > > + <table border="0" > > > cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%"> > > > + <tr><td bgcolor="#525D76"> > > > + <font color="#ffffff" face="arial,helvetica,sanserif"> > > > <a name="Welcome"><strong>Welcome</strong></a> > > > </font> > > > </td></tr> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.21 +28 -0 jakarta-site2/xdocs/index.xml > > > > > > Index: index.xml > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/index.xml,v > > > retrieving revision 1.20 > > > retrieving revision 1.21 > > > diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21 > > > --- index.xml 20 Jan 2002 16:28:07 -0000 1.20 > > > +++ index.xml 30 Jan 2002 21:53:03 -0000 1.21 > > > @@ -9,6 +9,34 @@ > > > > > > <body> > > > > > > +<section name="That flaming fireball in the sky..."> > > > +<p> > > > +In a recent <a > > > > > > +href="http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=Su > > > nInterview > > > +" > > > +>article</a>, Karen Tegan, Director of J2EE Compatibility > > > and Platform > > > +Services for Sun Microsystems, had the following to say: > > > +</p> > > > + > > > +<p> > > > +"The J2EE Compatible brand has achieved significant > > > momentum over the > > > +past two years, and we want to make sure that any open > > > source efforts > > > +don't impact the viability of that effort." > > > +</p> > > > + > > > +<p> > > > +In other words, Sun doesn't give a hoot about whether J2EE > > > licensing > > > +restricts open source J2EE products (in case you missed > > > it, it does). > > > +Thus, the Apache Software Foundation's involvement in the > > > Java Community > > > +Process (JCP) is simply an advertising statement for Sun > > > to claim that > > > +they have a 'vision which uses open standards and non-proprietary > > > +interfaces'. If you would like to express your opinions of Sun's > > > +licensing terms, feel free to contact <a > > > +href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a> and let us > > > know what you > > > +think. Thanks. > > > +</p> > > > + > > > +</section> > > > + > > > <section name="Welcome"> > > > > > > <!-- ApacheCon is over. > > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- www.superlinksoftware.com www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
