It might be fun to redraft the current docs on the JCP and send a *patch* to the JCP list. We could submit it as a JSR even.
-Andy On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 19:54, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 2002.1.30 4:15 PM, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My only issue and I guess this is directed more at you Jon, is it > > doesn't give me a clear idea about "what we want". Can you give me a > > good idea and I'll be glad to submit a patch to that effect. It just > > seems like we should be asking for something and being specific. > > > > -Andy > > That is a very good point. However, privately, Sun knows exactly what we > want. > > There is still some stuff that goes on behind the scenes around here that > unfortunately isn't exposed. Needless to say, discussions about opening some > of that up (including posting what we want to the public site) are going on > now. > > This is fun. > > p.s. The spec lead for JSR107 had a nice response to my complaints about the > license issues for that JSR. It went something like this: > > > As for the license, I can find no mention of Oracle requesting any money > > for anything. I seriously doubt if this license is significantly > > different than licenses for JSP's sponsored by other companies. > > Uh. Yea. Whatever dude. > > -jon > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- www.superlinksoftware.com www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
