On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 21:31, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > At 08:58 PM 1/30/2002 -0500, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > >I'd rather see someone come up with an opensource standard that achieves > >the goals of EJBs without being limited by its faulty design and > >backward compatibility with its original faultier design. Just my > >humble opinion on that. > > > Couldn't agree more. Any ideas on how to make such an Open Source standard > a "standard" in a sense that it would be accepted by the IT community as > way to do things? Maybe some kind of a Standard Committee under apache and > a working reference implementation based on one of the existing projects? >
The short answer: "If you build it they will come". I can help on this later if someone(s) with an EJB situation (which I don't presently have) can start the ball rolling. I'm presently at capacity, but I'd love to help out with the specs. -Andy > > ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- > - Andrei (a.k.a. Andrus) Adamchik > http://objectstyle.org > list email: andrus-jk at objectstyle dot org > personal email: andrus at objectstyle dot org > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- www.superlinksoftware.com www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
