I understand that Louis. The problem is that the PAL sits there waiting for it to be 8 and does nothing. So is it better to be >8 ? Why can't it count the (8) properly?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Louis Louw" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 7:17 AM Subject: RE: [General-discussion] PAL > Hi Michael, > > If you wait for the queue to be 8, then PAL will wait for it to be exactly > 8. > A better way I usually use is > > {Wait for queue to be 8 items or less} > while (Queue.count > 8) do > PAL.WaitForPlaycount(1); > > > Sincerely, > Louis Louw > http://www.spacialaudio.com > http://www.spacialnet.com > http://www.audiorealm.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Michael Hughes > Sent: 15 December 2007 02:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [General-discussion] PAL > > I am still having a problem with a PAL that I use for filling up the queue > just stopping to work. It shows it is waiting for the song queue to be at > 8 > - but the queue is empty. > > Does SAM count a zero length file that is unable to play or a song that is > unable to play as a "song"? > > Can we run too many PALS? > > _______________________________________________ > General-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.spacialaudio.com/mailman/listinfo/general-discussion > > TO unsubscribe to this list, simply send a blank email to > [email protected] > > with the subject > 'unsubscribe' > > > _______________________________________________ > General-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.spacialaudio.com/mailman/listinfo/general-discussion > > TO unsubscribe to this list, simply send a blank email to > [email protected] > > with the subject > 'unsubscribe'
