You may want to reply, fruitless as it may be. That he is correct, this is not a legislative issue, at least it wasn't until congress took it upon themselves to make it one, if he feels so strongly that it is not, maybe he should push to have the ruling reversed and put it in the hands of the businesses involved and leave the government out of it.
But that's just one man's opinion. Jim. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Hughes Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 6:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [General-discussion] Representative Response Representative Sam Graves, R-MO., responded to a recent letter I sent him. I specifically asked why he was not co-sponsoring the House Bill. His response was pretty specific and short. He does not feel that a legislative solution is needed. How do we counter this ideology? I am not real politically involved. But I do see the point, even though it may not apply to this situation. Many times we look for legislative intervention in matters that are not specifically a legislative issue. We have too many laws on the books now. However, correct me if I am wrong, this issue IS a legislative issue. Congress enacted the royalty process in the first place. And if I understand it correctly, we (webcasters) feel that this legislative body is out of hand with their proposal. Is that correct? _______________________________________________ General-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.spacialaudio.com/mailman/listinfo/general-discussion TO unsubscribe to this list, simply send a blank email to [email protected] with the subject 'unsubscribe'
