Meor, I suppose you are discussing flaws of OpenType?
t Meor Ridzuan Meor Yahaya wrote: > Mete, > Last time I tried, I did have problems to make it work in both > situation. If I were to make it work for the lam alef with floating > hamza, it does not work in the second case. If I were to make it work > for the second case, the first case does not work. That's why in the > text, for the first case it was encode as lam hamza alef, whereby the > second case was encoded with tatweel hamza above . This is just to > make it visually correct. There might be a way to accomplish this, but > we might need some help from experts it this (maybe from MS). This is > becasue I'm not sure why it does not work; It should have been. There > might be a bug somewhere (not sure where). > > Regards. > > On 9/20/05, Mete Kural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello Meor, >> >> Were you successful in getting U+0621 to render correctly in words >> like al-aakhira in aya 2:4 and ya'aadamu in aya 2:33 with the new >> font you're developing in both Windows and Linux? Can you use U+0621 >> in al-aakhira and have your font render it correctly or does >> Uniscribe and Pango not allow you to do that? >> >> Thanks, >> Mete >> >> -- >> Mete Kural >> Touchtone Corporation >> 714-755-2810 >> -- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> General mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > > > >> _______________________________________________ >> General mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/general
