On Sat, May 27, 2006, jess body wrote: > was always open-source with a liberal license. The other licesnse also > remains valid for non-GPL uses. The GPL announcement is here: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/urdu_computing/message/1081
What do you mean by "non-GPL uses"? What is wrong with the CRULP License is this (at least): | The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package | but no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold | by itself. Isn't this incompatible with GPL? -- adn Mohammed Adnène Trojette
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/general
