On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 August 2012 18:16, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ambivalent :) >> >> I do strongly believe that attic should equal attic-pmc. ie) there's >> no real issue with the current setup as you should be on the PMC (so >> should Henning). > > There are two disadvantages to this: > - it forces potential editors to join the PMC; they then need to
Pretty minor. They are effectively joining the PMC if they want to engage in CTR anyway, especially in this 'project'. > subscribe to private@attic Low volume list, and I don't see that it should be required :) > - updating the PMC requires a vote and a board ACK Fair point on the 72h delay being a pain the first time. > An alternative might be to permit @members (or even @committers) to > edit the Attic site. +1. I'd love to go further and declare all of @members to be on the PMC (and not require subscription). Hen
