On 29 April 2018 at 09:43, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29 April 2018 at 08:56, Henk P. Penning <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: >> >>> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 09:34:47 +0200 >>> From: sebb <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Proposed httpd tlp config changes for Attic redirects >> >> >>>> Why? The 'new' site should have this, of course : >>>> >>>> docs/flagged/oltu.apache.org/oltu.apache.org >>> >>> >>> I was assuming that would be dropped. >> >> >> Yes, eventually. >> The point is that fixing the httpd rules /can/ be done later. >> Having the new site compatible (in this respect) with the old, >> avoids more mucking around with the 'old' site. > > Equally, once the new rules are defined, it will be possible to test > them using whatever site is active.
I've just realised that oltu.us.apache.org exists but does not match the banner conditions. So adding flags/oltu.us.apache.org/banners would provide a simple test to show the new rules worked. >> "docs/flagged/oltu.apache.org/oltu.apache.org" is just one more >> static file that has to be preserved going from 'old' to 'new'. > > OK > >> As in "attic/site-lua/static/". >> >>>> -- that's enough to get oltu bannered >>>> -- atm, the /dist/ redirects are triggered by >>>> the presence of "projects/TLP.html" >>>> and that is unchanged (regards TLP's). >> >> >> Regards, >> >> HPP >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ _ >> Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403 _/ \_ >> Faculty of Science, Utrecht University T +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \ >> Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/ >> http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M [email protected] \_/
