nice job done: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data/projects-override/
thank you Sebb Le mardi 3 mars 2020, 15:12:15 CET sebb a écrit : > On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 21:53, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le jeudi 13 février 2020, 00:57:26 CET Mads Toftum a écrit : > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 03:21:04PM -0800, Hen wrote: > > > > Sounds good to me. I doubt folk are looking at the DOAP file for > > > > status > > > > instead of checking the updated site. > > > > > > Aren't these doap files used for building some of > > > https://projects.apache.org/projects.html? > > > > projects site uses > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data/pr > > ojects.xml to find DOAP files> > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 6:21 AM sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It's tedious getting access to a project DOAP in order to change the > > > > > PMC to the Attic. > > > > > > > > > > One solution is to drop the DOAP from the list of projects. > > > > > > > > > > Another might be to copy the DOAP into a separate area, update that > > > > > and change projects.xml to point to the updated DOAP. This could > > > > > probably be mostly automated. > > > > > > I was having a look around the infra tools repo and found > > > infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/attic_files/ > > > > > > There's a few project doap files in there but only from 2011 and 2012. > > > > > > > > The projects.xml file could retain the original location as a > > > > > comment > > > > > (and so could the DOAP copy) > > > > > > > > > > The downside is that the project repo would not have the change. > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > +1 > > we need to make it simple for us, or the job won't get done: if there are > > complaints later, we'll do the effort to update original DOAP file. > +1 > > > But I suppose nobody uses these original DOAP files, then we're currently > > just making our job harder "for fun"... > They are used by projects.a.o. -- unless we comment out the reference > in projects.xml. > That would solve the issue very easily, but it would hide potentially > useful information about past projects. > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/data/doaps/ looks perfect > > Perhaps. > > Whilst Attic is responsible for ensuring that the DOAPs get updated, > the data is used by projects.a.o. > > Thus I think the override DOAPs really belong under the p.a.o umbrella, i.e. > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data > > This also simplifies the update, since projects.xml can be updated at > the same time as the replacement DOAP is added. > > Note that a PMC can have multiple DOAPs, so the files need the PMC > name as part of the path. > Rather than have a separate folder for each PMC, I think a simple > prefix would be sufficient, as most PMCs have a single DOAP. > > The existing override file under > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/data/doaps/ will need to be moved. > > I intend to get started on that soon. > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > > Whichever is simpler. I think the way it's currently listed on > > > projects.a.o/projects.html works pretty well with the (in the Attic) on > > > the index the Retired note on the project page. > > > If anything, I might favor using Retired instead of "in the Attic" on > > > the project list, but that's really minor. > > > > > > vh > > > > > > Mads Toftum
