This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C15E45.F95B2920
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

grrr - outlook and exchange are evil - I can't force this bastard to post in
plain text.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Bucknum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [brluglist] [Fwd: NIPC Alert]



Check your iso's with md5sum against Redhat's published results from here 
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/iso/i386/MD5SUM
<ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/iso/i386/MD5SUM>  

-----Original Message----- 
From: Jeff Crosby [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:14 PM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: [brluglist] [Fwd: NIPC Alert] 


How can we tell if the iso's have been tampered with?  They could replace 
packages in them?  You mean, instead of 7.2 I could actually be installing 
something dangerous....like XP?  Let me know.  Jeff 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shannon Roddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To: "Baton Rouge Linux Users Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:46 PM 
Subject: [brluglist] [Fwd: NIPC Alert] 


> BE CAREFUL with those 7.2 CD's... Read below. 
> 
> Shannon 
> 
> -----Forwarded Message----- 
> 
> > From: Terry Doub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Subject: NIPC Alert 
> > Date: 25 Oct 2001 13:53:47 -0500 
> > 
> > The latest online update of Red Hat Linux, also known by its  code name,

> > "Enigma," which was released 23 October, could have been  tampered with 
by 
> > attackers, a security expert warned.  Copies of  Red Hat Linux 7.2 
> > available from some download sites were not digitally  signed by the 
> > developer, Red Hat Inc., according to Kurt Seifried,  author of an 
online 
> > book entitled "Linux Administrator's Security  Guide."  "Either Red Hat 
did 
> > not sign these packages, or someone  subverted the distribution process 
> > before the files got to various  sites," said Seifried in a security 
> > advisory issued 23 October.   Without such signatures, "it becomes 
trivial 
> > for an attacker to replace  packages on a distribution site with no one 
> > being able to easily verify  that they have been subverted," said 
> > Seifried's advisory.  A Red  Hat spokesperson said the company was 
studying 
> > the security  report. 
> > (Source: Newsbytes, 23 October) 
> ================================================ 
> BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group 
> Visit http://www.brlug.net <http://www.brlug.net>  for more information. 
> Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change 
> your subscription information. 
> ================================================ 

================================================ 
BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group 
Visit http://www.brlug.net <http://www.brlug.net>  for more information. 
Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change 
your subscription information. 
================================================ 


------_=_NextPart_001_01C15E45.F95B2920
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>RE: [brluglist] [Fwd: NIPC Alert]</TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=670114217-26102001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>grrr 
- 
outlook and exchange are evil - I can't force this bastard to post in plain 
text.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Kevin Bucknum 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, October 26, 2001 
  12:34 PM<BR><B>To:</B> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: 
  [brluglist] [Fwd: NIPC Alert]<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <P><FONT size=2>Check your iso's with md5sum against Redhat's published 
  results from here</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2><A 
  href="ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/iso/i386/MD5SUM"; 
  
target=_blank>ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/iso/i386/MD5SUM</A></FONT>
 
  </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>From: Jeff 
  Crosby [<A 
  href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>]</FONT> 
<BR><FONT 
  size=2>Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:14 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>To: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Subject: Re: [brluglist] [Fwd: 
  NIPC Alert]</FONT> </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>How can we tell if the iso's have been tampered with?&nbsp; 
  They could replace</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>packages in them?&nbsp; You mean, 
  instead of 7.2 I could actually be installing</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>something dangerous....like XP?&nbsp; Let me know.&nbsp; Jeff</FONT> 
  </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>----- Original Message -----</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>From: 
  "Shannon Roddy" &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>To: 
  "Baton Rouge Linux Users Group" &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:46 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>Subject: [brluglist] [Fwd: NIPC Alert]</FONT> </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>&gt; BE CAREFUL with those 7.2 CD's... Read below.</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; Shannon</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; -----Forwarded Message-----</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; From: Terry Doub 
  &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; To: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; Subject: NIPC 
  Alert</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; Date: 25 Oct 2001 13:53:47 
  -0500</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; The 
  latest online update of Red Hat Linux, also known by its&nbsp; code 
  name,</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; "Enigma," which was released 23 
  October, could have been&nbsp; tampered with</FONT> <BR><FONT 
size=2>by</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; attackers, a security expert warned.&nbsp; Copies 
  of&nbsp; Red Hat Linux 7.2</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; available from 
  some download sites were not digitally&nbsp; signed by the</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; &gt; developer, Red Hat Inc., according to Kurt Seifried,&nbsp; 
  author of an</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>online</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; 
  book entitled "Linux Administrator's Security&nbsp; Guide."&nbsp; "Either Red 
  Hat</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>did</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; not sign 
  these packages, or someone&nbsp; subverted the distribution process</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; before the files got to various&nbsp; sites," said 
  Seifried in a security</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; advisory issued 23 
  October.&nbsp;&nbsp; Without such signatures, "it becomes</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>trivial</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; for an attacker to 
  replace&nbsp; packages on a distribution site with no one</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; &gt; being able to easily verify&nbsp; that they have been 
  subverted," said</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; Seifried's advisory.&nbsp; 
  A Red&nbsp; Hat spokesperson said the company was</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>studying</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; the security&nbsp; 
  report.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; &gt; (Source: Newsbytes, 23 
  October)</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; 
  ================================================</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; 
  BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; Visit 
<A 
  href="http://www.brlug.net"; target=_blank>http://www.brlug.net</A> for more 
  information.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to 
  change</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; your subscription information.</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; ================================================</FONT> 
  </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>================================================</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>Visit <A href="http://www.brlug.net"; 
  target=_blank>http://www.brlug.net</A> for more information.</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>your subscription information.</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>================================================</FONT> 
</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C15E45.F95B2920--
================================================
BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group
Visit http://www.brlug.net for more information.
Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change
your subscription information.
================================================

Reply via email to