Absolutely,

The right name will appear out of nowhere once we get rolling on this 
one....



John Hebert wrote:
> Checking email in Albuquerque via AOhell:
> 
> We don't have to have $PROJECTNAME.org for a website.
> We can easily do all kinds of acronyms. Let's not
> worry about domain names right now and concentrate on
> getting the project going.
> 
> Just a suggestion.
> 
> John Hebert
> 
> --- Doug Riddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>I couldn't find a variation that wasn't taken.
>>
>>
>>--- mat branyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>sounds like a badass draft to me... and you dont
>>
>>*have* to have the
>>
>>>E in FOSSIL...
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>-mat
>>>--beta.latech.edu/~abs005 --out of order
>>>
>>>
>>>On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 06:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
>>>John Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>--- Doug Riddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>As we discussed, I submitted a project to
>>>>>sourceforge with the
>>>>>following outline:
>>>>>
>>>>>This project is aimed at putting Open Source
>>>>>documentation, Software
>>>>>and avenues to local technical support in all
>>>>
>>public
>>
>>>>>libraries.
>>>>>We aim develop an "adopt a library" program
>>>>>throughout the United
>>>>>States, if not globally.
>>>>>
>>>>>Our mission statement will become more defined
>>>>
>>and
>>
>>>>>evolved as our
>>>>>project grows legs.
>>>>>
>>>>>Currently our aims are to:
>>>>>1) Encourage groups and individuals to adopt
>>>>
>>and
>>
>>>>>support Pubilc
>>>>>Libraries and endow them with Open Source
>>>>
>>software.
>>
>>>>>2) Institute a "branding" concept that will
>>>>
>>let
>>
>>>>>librarians, end users
>>>>>and auditors verify the software via a
>>>>
>>checksum
>>
>>>>>database, or other
>>>>>mechanism.
>>>>>  A) This will help ensure that copyrights and
>>>>
>>other
>>
>>>>>concerns are not
>>>>>brought up.
>>>>>  B) ensure that the CDs actually contain the
>>>>>information cited on
>>>>>the label and not copyrighted, or
>>>>
>>objectionable
>>
>>>>>material.
>>>>>  C) Enable the librarian to check for latest
>>>>>versions.
>>>>>3) To put Open Source software into the hands
>>>>
>>of
>>
>>>>>people that might
>>>>>not otherwise be able to obtain it.
>>>>>4) Enable people interested in Open Source to
>>>>
>>have a
>>
>>>>>well established
>>>>>avenue for obtaining not only the software,
>>>>
>>but
>>
>>>>>support for it as
>>>>>well.
>>>>>5) Support niche applications currently
>>>>
>>burdened by
>>
>>>>>expensive
>>>>>software.
>>>>>  A) For example: Farmers who currently pay
>>>>>astounding amounts for
>>>>>specialty software. 
>>>>>  B)Schools and teachers who currently cannot
>>>>
>>afford
>>
>>>>>the hardware to
>>>>>run the "state of the supply" software.
>>>>>  C) To provide alternatives to people and
>>>>>organizations that cannot
>>>>>afford to upgrade thier hardware, but need
>>>>
>>increased
>>
>>>>>reliability and
>>>>>"reach" with their current hardware, or
>>>>
>>donated
>>
>>>>>hardware.
>>>>>
>>>>>Our methodology, as currently envisioned, is
>>>>
>>to
>>
>>>>>provide the public
>>>>>libraries with CDs for check out and copying. 
>>>>
>>We
>>
>>>>>hope to be able to
>>>>>provide the libraries with a way to create CDs
>>>>
>>on
>>
>>>>>demand.  We aim to
>>>>>provide documentation, Open Source software,
>>>>
>>and
>>
>>>>>contacts for
>>>>>technical support.
>>>>>
>>>>>Our hope is to contact and capitalize on the
>>>>
>>various
>>
>>>>>Librarian
>>>>>Associations to help put Open Source in the
>>>>
>>hands of
>>
>>>>>the people that
>>>>>need it most and have the least access to it.
>>>>>
>>>>>We are the Baton Rouge Linux User Group
>>>>>(www.brlug.net) and we want
>>>>>you to get involved with us.
>>>>>
>>>>>--------
>>>>>It will take up to three business days to hear
>>>>
>>from
>>
>>>>>them.  I will of
>>>>>course keep you informed.
>>>>>
>>>>>After some searching on the web, I went with
>>>>
>>PLLUG
>>
>>>>>as the name of the
>>>>>project.  Public Library Linux User Group.  We
>>>>
>>can
>>
>>>>>of cource alter
>>>>>that but all the good anagrams were taken. 
>>>>>PLLUG.org is open for
>>>>>registration.  PLLUG was not my first choice,
>>>>
>>it was
>>
>>>>>the first one
>>>>>(of very many) that seemed memorable and was
>>>>
>>open
>>
>>>>>for choosing as a
>>>>>dot org.
>>>>>
>>>>>I wasn't sure if this should go out to the
>>>>
>>general
>>
>>>>>mailing list or
>>>>>not, so I sent it to you two gentlemen.
>>>>
>>>>Damn, Doug. You're making me feel like I'm not
>>>
>>needed
>>
>>>>here. :)
>>>>
>>>>Thanks. Good write up. My notes were pretty much
>>>
>>the
>>
>>>>same thing.
>>>>
>>>>How about FOSSILE (Free and Open Source Software
>>>
>>In
>>
>>>>LibrariEs)? PLLUG is good, but it is kinda
>>>
>>skewed
>>
>>>>towards Linux then (genuflect in the direction
>>>
>>of
>>
>>>>RMS).
>>>>
>>>>I was thinking it would be cool if Larry Ewing
>>>
>>drew up
>>
>>>>a logo for us of Tux pulling a little red wagon
>>>
>>full
>>
>>>>of CDs.
>>>>
>>>>Here's my take on the mission statement:
>>>>-----------------------
>>>>The aim of Project X is to place free and open
>>>
>>source
>>
>>>>software on public library shelves around the
>>>
>>world to
>>
>>>>make it more easily available to the general
>>>
>>public.
>>
>>>>Why?
>>>>1. The aims of the Free|OSS community and public
>>>>libraries are the same: intellectual freedom.
>>>>2. Public libraries are properly seen as an
>>>
>>essential
>>
>>>>element in communities, so are a logical choice
>>>
>>for
>>
>>>>Free|OSS advocacy.
>>>>-----------------------
>>>>
>>>>Eh, I'm not real happy with my mission statement
>>>
>>yet.
>>
>>>>What do ya'll think?
>>>>
>>>>Doug, thanks again for jumping into the breech.
>>>
>>;)
>>
>>>>Reminder to those interested: this discussion
>>>
>>will be
>>
>>>>moved to a SourceForge mailing list as soon as
>>>
>>it is
>>
>>>>ready.
>>>>
>>>>John Hebert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>
> 
> === message truncated ===
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> 




Reply via email to