Unfortunately, that article is full of inaccuracies. I wouldn't put too much value in it. The article is on a humor site though so I'm not sure if this was intentional or not?
At 10:41 AM 5/23/2003 -0500, you wrote: >Here is an interesting twist on the above. > >http://www.i-want-a-website.com/about-linux/articles/may03/sco.shtml > >Enjoy and have a great weekend. > >Ed Richards > > >This email, including any attached files, may contain confidential and >privileged information. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure of >included information by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If >you are not a named recipient or authorized to receive and / or act on >information sent to a named recipient, or have reason to believe you are >not or should not be one of the named recipients, please notify sender >accordingly by reply email and delete all copies of this message prior to >forwarding, copying or otherwise reproducing this message or attachments >thereto. For information regarding the export control status of items >discussed in this document, please refer to the project control list. >Thank you. > > > >_______________________________________________ >General mailing list >[email protected] >http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net --- Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Puryear Information Technology Windows, UNIX, and IT Consulting http://www.puryear-it.com
