At 10:11 AM 9/14/2003 -0500, you wrote: >On 2003.09.14 03:37 -ray wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, will hill wrote: > > > I'll bet anyone a nickel that the only thing the monitor system and > > > state estimator have in common was Microsoft under it. > > > > I'd sure love to blame Microsoft for this also, but there are many other > > factors to consider. How bout blame the virus writer? Midwest ISO > > dropped the ball on several occasions. How bout blame Midwest ISO's IT > > guys for not patching their systems. ... [blame the user, blame the user]. > >OK, Midwest ISO's IT department should be spanked for using M$, if that's >what this turns out to be.
From what I read the major issues surrounding Midwest ISO are that it put itself in a situation where a few failures crippled its monitoring ability, and the lack of authority given to that agency in emergency situations. --- Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Puryear Information Technology, LLC <http://www.puryear-it.com> Providing expertise in the management, integration, and security of Windows and UNIX systems, networks, and applications.
